Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Proposed parameters of optimal central incisor positioning in orthodontic treatment planning: A systematic review

Korean Journal of Orthodontics 2022³â 52±Ç 1È£ p.53 ~ 65
Sangalli Linda, Dalessandri Domenico, Bonetti Stefano, Mandelli Gualtiero, Visconti Luca, Savoldi Fabio,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Sangalli Linda ) - University of Brescia Dental School Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health
 ( Dalessandri Domenico ) - University of Brescia Dental School Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health
 ( Bonetti Stefano ) - University of Brescia Dental School Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health
 ( Mandelli Gualtiero ) - University of Brescia Dental School Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health
 ( Visconti Luca ) - University of Brescia Dental School Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health
 ( Savoldi Fabio ) - University of Hong Kong Faculty of Dentistry Division of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics

Abstract


Objective: Planning of incisal position is crucial for optimal orthodontic treatment outcomes due to its consequences on facial esthetics and occlusion. A systematic summary of the proposed parameters is presented.

Methods: Studies on Google Scholar¨Ï, PubMed¨Ï, and Cochrane Library, providing quantitative information on optimal central incisor position were included.

Results: Upper incisors supero-inferior position (4?5 mm to upper lip, 67?73 mm to axial plane through pupils), antero-posterior position (3?4 mm to Nasion-A, 3?6 mm to A-Pogonion, 9?12 mm to true vertical line, 5 mm to A-projection, 9?10 mm to coronal plane through pupils), bucco-lingual angulation (4?7¡Æ to occlusal plane perpendicular on models, 20?22¡Æ to Nasion-A, 57?58¡Æ to upper occlusal plane, 16?20¡Æ to coronal plane through pupils, 108?110¡Æ to anterior-posterior nasal spine), mesio-distal angulation (5¡Æ to occlusal plane perpendicular on models). Lower incisors supero-inferior position (41?48 mm to soft-tissue mandibular plane), antero-posterior position (3?4 mm to Nasion-B, 1?3 mm to A-Pogonion, 12?15 mm to true vertical line, 6?8 mm to coronal plane through pupils), bucco-lingual angulation (1-4¡Æ to occlusal plane perpendicular on models, 87?94¡Æ to mandibular plane, 68¡Æ to Frankfurt plane, 22?25¡Æ to Nasion-B, 105¡Æ to occlusal plane, 64¡Æ to lower occlusal plane, 21¡Æ to A-Pogonion), mesio-distal angulation (2¡Æ to occlusal plane perpendicular on models).

Conclusions: Although these findings can provide clinical guideline, they derive from heterogeneous studies in terms of subject characteristics and reference methods. Therefore, the optimal incisal position remains debatable.

Å°¿öµå

Esthetics; Incisors; Cephalometrics; Occlusion

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed